Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1990
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1990

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

(1) Symbolic complex algebra in mathematica and (2) Dsolve

  • To: mathgroup at yoda.ncsa.uiuc.edu
  • Subject: (1) Symbolic complex algebra in mathematica and (2) Dsolve
  • From: ken yip <yip-ken at CS.YALE.EDU>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Nov 90 18:00:16 EST

(1) I hope I am not correct about this.  I want to define a complex quantity

	z = x + I y

so that 

	Re[z] ==> x
	Im[z] ==> y
        Conjugate[z] ==> x - I y

etc.  Mathematica doesn't seem to know how to do this even after I define
x and y to be real by

	x/: RealQ[x] = True

(Of course, this does not change the head of x which is still Symbol.)   
Next I tried to define some transformation rules, but then I couldn't
find a way to specify the pattern variable to be of type real AND symbol.


(2) I want to solve a simple harmonic equation with boundary conditions:

DSolve[{x'[t] == y[t], y'[t] ==  k^2 x[t], y'[-h] == 0},{x[t],y[t]}, t]

But mathematica seems to ignore the boundary constraint.


Any wisdom?

P.S.  Originally I plan to use Mathematica to help me solve some
linear non-homogenous PDEs, but after a few hours playing witb it,
I am becoming increasingly frustrated with many of the simple things
it can't do.  Is that due to my insufficient knowledge of mathematica
or is that due to mathematica itself?




  • Prev by Date: Simplify made more intelligent
  • Next by Date: Re: Symbolic complex algebra in mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Simplify made more intelligent
  • Next by thread: Re: Symbolic complex algebra in mathematica