Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1991

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive


  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: Tanh
  • From: Stephen Wolfram <swolf>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Mar 91 14:58:04 -0600

printf("%g %g\n", tanh(-1.73287), tanh(-1.73288));

in a minimal C program on a NeXT under OS version 2.0 shows a 

Mathematica (apparently mistakenly) relies on built-in math functions.

Stephen Wolfram <swolf at>
>From mathgroup-adm at Sun Mar  3 05:33:44 1991
Received: from by with SMTP id AA15204
  (5.65+/IDA-1.3.4 for cat >> /users/swolf/Mail/incoming); Sun, 3 Mar 91 05:33:44 -0600
Received: by id AA19424
  (5.64+/IDA-1.3.4 for ); Sun, 3 Mar 91 01:00:00 -0600
Received: by id AA19420
  (5.64+/IDA-1.3.4 for /usr/lib/sendmail -odq -oi -fmathgroup-adm at mathgroup-out); Sun, 3 Mar 91 00:59:59 -0600
Message-Id: <9103030659.AA19420 at>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 91 23:14:01 EST
From: "Alfred Gray" <gray at>
Subject: Bug in Tanh.
To: mathgroup at

I do get a bug in graphing Tanh from -3 to 3 when I use operating
system 2.0 on a NeXT.  On the other hand, it graphs OK on a Sun.
Since Seamen gets no bug under operating system 1.0 of the NeXT,
I conclude that the problem must be between the interface of Mathematica
and the 2.0 Operating system.
(The same bug also occurs in my beta version Mathematica2.0 for the NeXT).

Alfred Gray

  • Prev by Date: Re: Bug in Tanh.
  • Next by Date: Bug in Tanh[x] (summary and speculation)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Bug in Tanh.
  • Next by thread: Bug in Tanh[x] (summary and speculation)