|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
What should Mma be?
- To: mathgroup at yoda.physics.unc.edu
- Subject: What should Mma be?
- From: Tapio Luttinen <100013.2275 at compuserve.com>
- Date: 03 Dec 92 02:33:51 EST
Hi Mathgroupers,
Concerning the discussion about the essence of Mma in the future. In my
opinion Mathematica should be developed both as a mathematical and
presentation tool.
1) Having to use other programs to present the results means that I have
to do part of the job twice. This is contrary to the basic idea of Mma -
Let a computer do the routine work.
2) Good looking graphics is a marketing aid that increases the sales. This
makes it possible to spend more on R&D. If Mathematica is a tool for
research workers in universities only, the resources to develop
mathematical algorithms would be smaller. So, good looking graphics
enables better mathematical algorithms.
Tapio
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tapio Luttinen Tel. (work) +358 (18) 524-252 |
| TL Consulting Engineers Ltd. Tel. (home) +358 (18) 563-332 |
| Vesijarvenkatu 26 A Tel. (mobile) +358 (49) 350-298 |
| 15140 Lahti Fax +358 (18) 830-660 |
| FINLAND E-mail 100013.2275 at compuserve.com |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Prev by Date:
Re: time consumption FindRoot
Next by Date:
What should Mma be?
Previous by thread:
Re: time consumption FindRoot
Next by thread:
What should Mma be?
|