Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1992
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1992

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

A Simplify that really simplifies? Summary

  • To: mathgroup at yoda.physics.unc.edu
  • Subject: A Simplify that really simplifies? Summary
  • From: p617hfa at sun24.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Heino Falcke)
  • Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 10:10:11 +0100

Hi mathgroup,
Just a short summary of the answers I received concerning 
my question about simplification rules for Mathematica.
Actually I received only one hint (Package SubExpressionAccess.m,
Mathematica Journal Vol.1) which however was only of limited use because
the Package was also unable to Simplify my trivial example (a^2+2 a b +b^2 +x)
in an easy manner.
On the other hand quite a few people said to have similar problems with
Mathematica. 
Example:
>> I hope someone has such a Simplify function. If you find one,
>> please let me know. I have found this severely limits the usefulness om Mma
>> for me.

Sorry, but until know I haven't seen one.

Heino Falcke







  • Prev by Date: "error while printing"-Message on Next-Mma2.0
  • Next by Date: neural nets in mathematica follow-up.
  • Previous by thread: "error while printing"-Message on Next-Mma2.0
  • Next by thread: Re: A Simplify that really simplifies? Summary