|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
A Simplify that really simplifies? Summary
- To: mathgroup at yoda.physics.unc.edu
- Subject: A Simplify that really simplifies? Summary
- From: p617hfa at sun24.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Heino Falcke)
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 10:10:11 +0100
Hi mathgroup,
Just a short summary of the answers I received concerning
my question about simplification rules for Mathematica.
Actually I received only one hint (Package SubExpressionAccess.m,
Mathematica Journal Vol.1) which however was only of limited use because
the Package was also unable to Simplify my trivial example (a^2+2 a b +b^2 +x)
in an easy manner.
On the other hand quite a few people said to have similar problems with
Mathematica.
Example:
>> I hope someone has such a Simplify function. If you find one,
>> please let me know. I have found this severely limits the usefulness om Mma
>> for me.
Sorry, but until know I haven't seen one.
Heino Falcke
Prev by Date:
"error while printing"-Message on Next-Mma2.0
Next by Date:
neural nets in mathematica follow-up.
Previous by thread:
"error while printing"-Message on Next-Mma2.0
Next by thread:
Re: A Simplify that really simplifies? Summary
|