MathGroup Archive 1994

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: mathematica V 2.2.2 runs 2X faster in PowerPC (native) than in 486/66 with mathematica V2.2 (enh)

  • To: mathgroup at christensen.Cybernetics.NET
  • Subject: [mg282] Re: [mg269] mathematica V 2.2.2 runs 2X faster in PowerPC (native) than in 486/66 with mathematica V2.2 (enh)
  • From: yoda at ele.crl.melco.co.jp (Kiyoshi Yoda)
  • Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 11:29:16 +0900

At  2:09 PM 94.12.1 +0000, Julio C Proano +1 508 960 2347 wrote:
>486/66 Ver 2.2 (enhanced) for Windows
>
>Timing[Inverse[Table[Random[],{100},{100}]];]
>{2.31000000000131*Second, Null}
>Timing[N[Pi,500];]
>{0.1099999999969441*Second, Null}
>Timing[10000!][[1]]
>21.15000000000145*Second

I also tested above commands on my 486/66 & mma v.2.2.2(enhanced)
for Windows.
The results are very different. Very curious about your machine.
Mine has 256K cache. Do you have more cache?

Timing[Inverse[Table[Random[],{100},{100}]];]
{3.131 Second, Null}
Timing[N[Pi,500];]
{0.33 Second, Null}
Timing[10000!][[1]]
17.356 Second




--
Kiyoshi Yoda       yoda at ele.crl.melco.co.jp
Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Central Res. Lab.
8-1-1 Tsukaguchi Hommachi, Amagasaki 661 Japan






  • Prev by Date: Re: Power Mac Performance
  • Next by Date: Re: Finding index (easy?)
  • Previous by thread: mathematica V 2.2.2 runs 2X faster in PowerPC (native) than in 486/66 with mathematica V2.2 (enh)
  • Next by thread: Re: Bugs ... bzzzz