[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: function definition
*To*: mathgroup at christensen.cybernetics.net
*Subject*: RE: function definition
*From*: Chip Sample <sample at shire.ac.arknet.edu>
*Date*: Fri, 21 Oct 1994 09:52:25 CDT
Can anyone explain the principle for function definition that yields the
following:
First define f2[x]:
in: f2[x_] := x + 2;
in: ?f2
out: Global`f2
f2[x_] := x + 2
Now re-define f2[x], and we see that the old definition has been overwritten:
in: f2[x_] := x + 3;
in: ?f2
out: Global`f2
f2[x_] := x + 3
But now define f2[y], and see that the old definition
is the one that is used by Mma!
in: f2[y_] := y + 4;
out: ?f2
Global`f2
f2[x_] := x + 3
f2[y_] := y + 4
Check out values of f2. They're all from the x + 3 definition:
in: f2[x]
out: 3 + x
in: f2[y]
out: 3 + y
in: f2[1]
out: 4
_____________________________/________________________________________________
David Kramer Telephone: (717) 291-4339
Coordinator of Academic Computing e-mail: D_Kramer at Acad.FandM.edu
Franklin & Marshall College FAX: (717) 399-4446
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604-3003 USA
_______________________________________________________________________\______
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I call that a bug. Clearly Mma uses the first definition it finds it its list,
but I think the second definition should over write the first.
The only thing I could think was that if before f2[x_] was defined, x was
declared an integer (say), and before f2[y_] was defined, y was declared a
vector, then f2 could be used to do different things depending on the data type
it is sent. BUT THIS DOESN'T WORK. So I think its a bug.
Chip
Prev by Date:
**linespacing and subscripts in graphics**
Next by Date:
**Re: Plot in reverse order**
Previous by thread:
**function definition**
Next by thread:
**Re: function definition**
| |