Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1995
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1995

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Bug in symbolic inversion of matrices

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg2637] Re: Bug in symbolic inversion of matrices
  • From: withoff (David Withoff)
  • Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 21:01:47 -0500

In article <49dp5g$8a6 at dragonfly.wri.com> chapman at bonnie.drea.dnd.ca  
(David M.F. Chapman) writes:
> I have not been following this newsgroup, so I apologize if the  
following is
> old hat:
> 
> We have found a probable bug involving the symbolic inversion of  
matrices. 
> Up to size 6x6 works fine, but starting with 7x7, all the memory is  
gobbled
> up and the abort calculation command does not work.  Funny thing, it  
only
> acts up when the result is printed, so it may have more to do with that
> aspect than the inversion itself.  I will send the annotated notebook
> documenting this bug to anyone interested. (I have already sent a copy  
to
> Wolfram Research.)
>  
************************************************************************** 
*****
> Dave Chapman                         DREA            phone: (902)  
426-3100 x228
> dave.chapman at drea.dnd.ca                               FAX: (902)  
426-9654      
> 
> 

I suspect that your computer is just running out of memory.
Formatting an expression often requires a lot more memory than
storing it in an internal form.  Here is an example.

In[1]:= m = Inverse[{{a11, a12, a13}, {a21, a22, a23}, {a31, a32, a33}}] ;

In[2]:= ByteCount[m]

Out[2]= 3748

In[3]:= ByteCount[PrintForm[m]]

Out[3]= 46256

This is also true outside of Mathematica.  A double-precision
number, for example, is typically stored in 8 bytes of memory,
but it requires 16 bytes to store the 16 decimal digits in the
printed base-10 representation of the number.

Formatting also eliminates the possibility of saving memory
by sharing common subexpressions, since, although it is ok for
the program internally to use pointers to common subexpressions,
it is not ok to do that on a printed page.

Depending on the details of your example, formatting the 7 x 7
matrix could require perhaps 10 times as much memory as formatting
the 6 x 6 matrix, which would explain why formatting a 6 x 6
matrix works fine, but formatting a 7 x 7 matrix doesn't.

Of course the fact that Mathematica and/or computers in general
behave badly when they are about to run out of memory is itself
arguably a bug, but that is a separate issue.

Dave Withoff
Wolfram Research






  • Prev by Date: Re: Bug in symbolic inversion of matrices
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: What's in the " .mb" files????
  • Previous by thread: Re: Bug in symbolic inversion of matrices
  • Next by thread: Re: X-FrontEnd crashes upon certain keystrokes