MathGroup Archive 1995

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: Bug ListPlot?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg2765] RE: [mg2755] Bug ListPlot?
  • From: "John R. Fultz" <jfultz>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 01:47:12 -0500

The option PlotJoined->True, by design, does not put the points on
the graph.  You can combine a line graph and a point graph by doing
the following:

g1=LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic,
	PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}]

g2=LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic,
	PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}, PlotJoined -> True]

Show[g1,g2]

John Fultz
Wolfram Research, Inc.

----------
From: 	Will Self[SMTP:wself at viking.emcmt.edu]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: 	[mg2755] Bug ListPlot?

A student of mine wanted to get plots of some data points.  He wanted
to show the points large and connect them with lines. . Here is what he
did:

data={{1,1},{2,3},{3,2}}

LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic,
PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}]

LogLogListPlot[data,GridLines -> Automatic,
PlotStyle -> {PointSize[0.04]}, PlotJoined -> True]


In the first plot, he got large points but in the second plot the large points
were absent.  He is doing this on a PC.  I tried this also on a Macintosh and
got the same behavior.  Would someone try it on somethihng else and see
what happens?  Would you call this a bug in ListPlot?

Will Self





  • Prev by Date: Re: numerical solutions to matrices??
  • Next by Date: Help [Q] with Timing[] problem
  • Previous by thread: Re: Bug ListPlot?
  • Next by thread: Re: Bug ListPlot?