|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: natural log of E
- To: mathgroup at christensen.cybernetics.net
- Subject: [mg2017] Re: natural log of E
- From: wagner at bullwinkle.cs.Colorado.EDU (Dave Wagner)
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 23:29:11 -0400
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
In article <DEKnts.Avv at wri.com>,
>
>I suspect that the reason that Mathematica is not able to
>interpret "Log[E^n]" as "n" might have to do with the fact that
>"Log" is a multivalued function of its argument, and Mathematica
>isn't able to decide on which Riemann sheet to put the answer.
>However, this isn't an entirely satisfactory answer, since when I
>ask for "Log[E]", mm spits out "1" rather than "1 + 2 Pi I n_Integer"
>or somesuch. /*shrug*/ Beats me. I guess that's a question for
>the experts.
ComplexExpand[Log[Exp[n]]] returns n. The following command, which
tells ComplexExpand to treat n as a complex number, reflects the
multi-valued aspect of the Log function (albeit by expressing the
result in terms of another multi-valued function, ArcTan).
In[5]:=
ComplexExpand[Log[Exp[n]], n]
Out[5]=
I ArcTan[Cos[Im[n]], Sin[Im[n]]] + Re[n]
Dave Wagner
Principia Consulting
(303) 786-8371
dbwagner at princon.com
http://www.princon.com/princon
Prev by Date:
Advice on "MMA for Scientists and Engineers" Book
Next by Date:
Re: Q: D[EllipticK[k],k] ?
Previous by thread:
natural log of E
Next by thread:
Re: natural log of E
|