|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: BUG or FEATURE in Interpolation[] ?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg4632] Re: BUG or FEATURE in Interpolation[] ?
- From: Harald Berndt <haraldb at nature.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 03:54:51 -0400
- Organization: University of California Forest Products Lab
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Stefan Schulz wrote:
> ...
> I found to my surprise, that the function returned by Interpolation
> is not smooth at some of the data points!
Well, it is documented: The Book says that the approximated function
varies smoothly between sample points, nothing about smoothness of
derivatives at sample points. And if you set InterpolationOrder -> 1,
you get just plain linear interpolation.
>For this reason I resorted to
> write a package Spline1D which returns a smooth cubic spline as a
> pure function, but is naturally slower than the built-in Interpolation
> command.
You could probably have used the "Graphics`Spline`" standard package.
>Did I find a bug or is this a feature? If it is a feature
> it certainly makes the Interpolation command not suitable to obtain
> smooth curves.
There's also InterpolatingPolynomial (which returns something you
probably don't want in your particular example) and of course Fit[] or
NonlinearFit[].
--
_______________________________________________________________
Harald Berndt University of California
Research Specialist Forest Products Laboratory
Phone: 510-215-4224 FAX:510-215-4299
_______________________________________________________________
==== [MESSAGE SEPARATOR] ====
Prev by Date:
Re: --->What is the problem with 'ParametricPlot'?
Next by Date:
Announcing 1996 Undergraduate Computational Science Education Awards
Previous by thread:
Re: BUG or FEATURE in Interpolation[] ?
Next by thread:
Re: [Q] Plotting non-continuous function
|