Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1996
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1996

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica vs ?

  • Subject: [mg2868] Re: [mg2860] Mathematica vs ?
  • From: drjoansa at rain.org (Joan Saniuk)
  • Date: 2 Jan 1996 05:13:27 -0600
  • Approved: usenet@wri.com
  • Distribution: local
  • Newsgroups: wri.mathgroup
  • Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
  • Sender: daemon at wri.com

On Sat, 30 Dec 1995, Doug Wellington wrote:

> ... why should I buy Mathematica over
> any of the other packages, such as MathCad, Matlab or Maple?
> What are their individual strengths?  The only think I've
> heard is that MathCad is super easy, Maple supports symbolic
> math, and that Matlab is powerful and portable...  Where
> does Mathematica fit into this?
>...

mathematica supports symbolic math.  having used both maple and 
mathematica, i prefer mathematica as having a more straightforward
user interface.  I used mathematica for both symbolic and computational 
matrix algebra problems when I was a working engineer, and have access to
maple at the junior college where I now teach math.  i am finding maple
harder to learn.

hope you find this helpful!

******
Joan M. Saniuk          //        Ventura, CA
******



  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica vs ?
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica vs ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica vs ?
  • Next by thread: Re: Mathematica vs ?