Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1997
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1997

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Speeding up calculations by lowering the precision ?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg7913] Speeding up calculations by lowering the precision ?
  • From: "Frank" <F.J.M.Geurts at fys.ruu.nl>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 03:22:05 -0400
  • Organization: Universiteit Utrecht
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,
I've written a lengthy math file which will eventually perform some
numerical calculations based on a couple of NIntegrate's. Right now, these
calculations take a very long time on a 466Mhz Alpha (running Math 2.2.4 /
Digital Unix 4.0). In fact i'be estimated another month (!). Everything
runs under 'default' conditions, i.e. Precision and WorkingPrecision are
based on the $MachinePrecision (which is 16). However, I am not really
interested in this high Precision but in high Speed : I would like all my
calculations to be performed at a 4-5 digit precision. I'm getting rather
confused of the actual Precision since after forcing NIntegrate with
WorkingPrecision->8 and PrecisionGoal->4 Mathematica still claims 16digit
precision in the results ...

Can anybody help me out on these two questions:
1) Can (extensive) calculations be speeded up by lowering the Precision
_below_ the $MachinePrecision ?
2) How can I be sure that all the calculations will be at a maximum 
precision set by me, without having to control/adjust each NIntegrate ?


best regards,
Frank

---
 F.J.M. Geurts        Dept. Subatomic Physics  Utrecht University
 R.J.v/d Graafflab.   +31-30-2532210/1492      geurts at fys.ruu.nl
 p.o. box 80,000      fax:   2518689      http://www.fys.ruu.nl/~geurts
 3508 TA  Utrecht     The Netherlands



  • Prev by Date: partial DE and finite difference
  • Next by Date: Re: Problem with Conditiond Function
  • Previous by thread: partial DE and finite difference
  • Next by thread: Re: More on Positive[x]