|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: subscripts in function definitions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg7994] Re: subscripts in function definitions
- From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 23:57:46 -0400
- Organization: University of Western Australia
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Mike Golding wrote:
> Is it possible to use subscripted variables in a function definition?
>
> something like
>
> f[x sub 1_, x sub 2_] := x sub 1 / x sub 2
>
> where by x sub 1 I mean the visually subscripted form obtained
> either from the palette or the keyboard. I just wonder if I'm doing
> something stupid. Mma just seems to want to multiply the blanks
> by the subscripted variable within variable list which is not what I
> want.
What you want is possible -- you first need to Symbolize your
variables. The Utilities`Notation` package does what you want (and a
whole lot more too!).
Cheers,
Paul
____________________________________________________________________
Paul Abbott Phone: +61-8-9380-2734
Department of Physics Fax: +61-8-9380-1014
The University of Western Australia
Nedlands WA 6907 mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au
AUSTRALIA http://www.pd.uwa.edu.au/Paul
God IS a weakly left-handed dice player
____________________________________________________________________
Prev by Date:
Re: Wrong behavior of CrossProduct
Next by Date:
Conference on Computer Algebra Systems, Dec 1997, Belarus
Previous by thread:
Re: subscripts in function definitions
Next by thread:
Wrong behavior of CrossProduct
|