|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Discrepancy betw HP unix and mac versions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg7240] Re: [mg7211] Discrepancy betw HP unix and mac versions
- From: seanross at worldnet.att.net
- Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 19:13:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
StephenBou wrote:
>
> I noticed a discrepancy in the way Mathematica for HP unix (version 2.2)
> and the Macintosh 3.0 versions handle the % operator for a series of
> commands WITHIN THE SAME NOTEBOOK CELL.
>
> In the HP unix version, these commands in a single cell,
>
> 2+2;
> x=%
>
> gives as output and assign to 'x':
>
> 4
>
> But Macintosh version 3.0 assigns to 'x' the value of whatever command
> happened to be evaluated beforehand.
>
> Will all 3.0 versions perform the same way? What gives? The 3.0 version
> for macintosh would seem to implement the series of commands in a single
> cell in an undesirable way.
>
> BTW, if the same 2 statements were entered in the mac version 3.0 IN
> DIFFERENT CELLS, the results would be as in the HP unix case.
>
> -- Stephen
>
> stephenbou at aol.com
I have a windows95 pentium and have noticed that I must put things in
different cells to get them to execute correctly. For example, a Needs
statement can't be in the same cell as a function call to the context
the Needs requests. At least this strange execution order doesn't seem
to be followed in Module constructs. It would have crippled the
language.
Prev by Date:
Re: Discrepancy betw HP unix and mac versions
Next by Date:
Re: arguments in functions
Previous by thread:
Re: Discrepancy betw HP unix and mac versions
Next by thread:
Bugs in Mathematica ver: 3.0 ?
|