|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: mathlink & MS Visual C++ 6.0
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg15030] Re: [mg15009] Re: mathlink & MS Visual C++ 6.0
- From: MJE <evans_nospam at gte.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 04:12:17 -0500
- Organization: None
- References: <73d383$i9g@smc.vnet.net> <199812050630.BAA04492@smc.vnet.net.>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Apropos of that --
I've had problems going way back to version 2 with MathLink not working
under C++; and that was on Macintosh. I ended up having to wrap all
the MathLink code in "extern 'C'". That was a long time ago. Now I
learn that things are still this way.
MathLink is hard enough to master without the hassles of C vs. C++
interfacing. What this problem means is that all the books on C++
algorithms are useless with MathLink. (You have to create a plain-C
buffer between MathLink and the algorithms if you want to use them.)
It also means that nice, clean, object-based string-handling functions
cannot be used to deal with the string expression requirements of
MathLink.
It's ironic that WRI is selling MathCode C++ without having fixed this
problem with MathLink itself. Maybe they could get the people who
built MathCode C++ to work on fixing MathLink as well.
Mark
remove "_nospam" to reply
Kevin Leuthold wrote:
>
> I had a private email conversation with John regarding the problem he
> described, and want to share with the whole group my answer to him
> since it may be of interest to anyone else compiling MathLink programs
> with Visual C++.
>
> John was giving mprep-generated code a .cpp extension, rather than a .c
> extension. In other words, instead of
>
> mprep addtwo.tm -o addtwotm.c
>
> he was typing
>
> mprep addtwo.tm -o addtwotm.cpp
>
> Unfortunately, mprep generates code that fails to compile under the
> stronger type checking that Visual C++ performs on .cpp files. This
> probably should be considered a bug in mprep.
>
> Fortunately, there is a simple workaround, which is to always give
> mprep-generated code a .c extension rather than .cpp. Of course, this
> would mean that any C++ code in a .tm file would have to be taken out
> and put in a .cpp file.
>
> Other than this bug that John has pointed out, there are no known
> problems with building MathLink programs using Microsoft Visual C++
> 6.0.
>
> Kevin Leuthold
> MathLink Group
> Wolfram Research
>
> John Gore <gore_john at bah.com> writes:
>
> >I just moved to Vis C++ 6.0 from 4.0 and cant get my mathlink programs
> >to compile.
>
> > I have problems with the MLInitializeIcon routine produced by mprep. I
> >get errors from a lack of casting on structs HINSTANCE and HBRUSH
>
> >This happens even in the addtwo example.
>
> >Anyone using MS Vis C++ 6.0 ?
>
> >Im using Mathematica 3.01
> >Current version of Mathlink as Downloaded Windows 95
>
> >Thanks - JG
Prev by Date:
Re: nice Gotcha!
Next by Date:
Re: nice Gotcha!
Previous by thread:
Re: mathlink & MS Visual C++ 6.0
Next by thread:
Re: mathlink & MS Visual C++ 6.0
|