Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1998
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1998

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: My own sum



Allan,

does'nt it jump out that a "pure function" approach to dummy variables
in integration and summation would solve such problems? The syntactic
level is in fact a "humanoid" version of:
Sum[F[#],{#,-a,a}]& @ dummy
instead of 
Sum[F[#],{#,-a,a}]&
as it "should" be.
Thomas Lemm has a point : a set of de-dummy-fying rules could in
principle be added to Mathematica. Or not?


At 20:31 18.02.98 -0500, you wrote:
>Thomas Lemm wrote:
>> 
>> I want to implement another type of Sum to treat expressions in a
>> "physical" manner. But I need to know how Mathematica tackles the
>> Problem:
>> 
>> Sum[F[x],{x,-a,a}]==Sum[F[y],{y,-a,a}]
>> 
>Thomas,
>In[1]:=
>Sum[F[x],{x,-a,a}]==Sum[F[y],{y,-a,a}]
>
>Out[1]=
>Sum[F[x], {x, -a, a}] == Sum[F[y], {y, -a, a}]
>
>Mathematica stops at the syntactical level.
>
>We need to buid in some way of making the syntactical forms to sam
>
>In[15]:=
>%/.x|y->xy
>
>Out[15]=
>True
>
>But we need to avoid variabel clashes and deal with depndencies amongst
>the summation variables.
>-- 
>Allan Hayes
>Mathematica Training and Consulting
>Leicester, UK
>hay@haystack.demon.co.uk
>http://www.haystack.demon.co.uk
>voice: +44 (0)116 271 4198
>fax: +44 (0)116 271 8642
>
>

NV Vandemoortele Coordination Center Oils & Fats Applied Research
Prins Albertlaan 79
Postbus 40
B-8870 Izegem (Belgium)
Tel: +/32/51/33 21 11
Fax: +/32/51/33 21 75
vdmcc@vandemoortele.be




  • Prev by Date: elkjer@post7.tele.dk
  • Next by Date: Question about Mathematica
  • Prev by thread: Re: My own sum
  • Next by thread: Re: My own sum