MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: TeXForm with long expressions

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg18363] Re: TeXForm with long expressions
  • From: "Xiaogang Wang" <xgwang at emu.thchem.ox.ac.uk>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:13:28 -0400
  • Organization: Oxford University, England
  • References: <7l0jdg$chl@smc.vnet.net> <7l3mmj$gen@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Dear Hinton
If the expression is long, TeXForm does not know where to fold it. My
solution
is to split the expression manually. For example,

TeXForm[TraditionalForm[expr[[{1,2,3}]] ]]
TeXForm[TraditionalForm[expr[[{4,5}]] ]]
TeXForm[TraditionalForm[expr[[{6,7,8}]] ]]
....

I use TraditionalForm since I want variable to be italic, however sometimes
TraditionalForm gives me expr[[{1,3,2}]] instead of expr[[{1,2,3}]], again
a small problem.

Xiaogang


P.J. Hinton <paulh at wolfram.com> wrote in message
news:7l3mmj$gen at smc.vnet.net...
> In article <7l0jdg$chl at smc.vnet.net>, "Xiaogang Wang"
<xgwang at emu.thchem.ox.ac.uk> writes:
>
> >  I have a long expressions to be transformed to latex format.
> > I am not satisfied with 'TeXForm'.
> >
> > Are there some good package to give latex output?
>
> To the best of my knowledge, there are no extensive third-party
> implementations of translators from Mathematica sytnax to TeX
> and friends.
>
> Can you enumerate in precise terms exactly what you find to be
> dissatisfactory?  Perhaps we can suggest some workarounds.
>
> --
> P.J. Hinton
> Mathematica Programming Group paulh at wolfram.com
> Wolfram Research, Inc.
> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein are those of the author alone.
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Need just enough underbars
  • Next by Date: Re: easiest way to sort a list?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Need just enough underbars
  • Next by thread: Re: TeXForm with long expressions