|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg18596] Re: [mg18559] Re: [mg18489] Simplifying constants...bug?
- From: BobHanlon at aol.com
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:01:28 -0400
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Alan,
This is done using version 4; however, I believe the results will be the same
in version 3.
(a + c*d)/(c*d) //. c*d -> -z
(a - z)/(c*d)
FullForm[%]
Times[Power[c, -1], Power[d, -1], Plus[a, Times[-1, z]]]
Note that the FullForm does not include the product c*d. Ingeneral, I find
that it works better to structure a replacement such that a single variable
rather than an expression is being replaced.
(a + c*d)/(b + c*d) //. c -> -z /d
(a - z)/(b - z)
(a + c*d)/(c*d) //. c -> -z/d
-((a - z)/z)
Bob Hanlon
In a message dated 7/10/99 8:40:24 AM, calvitti at boes.ces.cwru.edu writes:
>here's some intersting behavior in 3.0:
>
> (a + c*d)/(b + c*d) //. c*d -> -z
>
>gives (as expected):
>
> (a - z)/(b - z)
>
>yet
>
> (a + c*d)/(c*d) //. c*d -> -z
>
>no longer simplifes the denominator:
>
> (a+b-z)/(c*d)
>
>anyone know why?
>
Prev by Date:
Re: RE: Re: Re: easiest way to sort a list?
Next by Date:
Re: Simplifying constants
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Simplifying constants...bug?
|