Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1999
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: RealTime3D

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg18103] Re: RealTime3D
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:26:39 -0400
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <7juc6b$582@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi Pitak,

you can switch to MathGL3d from

http://www.mpae.gwdg.de/~kuska/mview3d.html

It has in it's menu a axis dialog to allow 3d axis with
labels.

Regards
  Jens

Pitak Chenkosol wrote:
> 
>         Hello,
> 
>         I found that the experimental object "RealTime3D' that is included
>         with Mathematica 4.0 is quite useful for my work. Is it possible to
>         invoke the RealTime3D object then execute a 3D plot with all the axes'
>         tick marks and labels included.
> 
>         I could not find any additional info anywhere about the RealTime3D
>         object's plot options. A search of the on-line help turned up the
>         info for RealTime3D and RealTimeGraphicsDisplayFunction but the
>         descriptions for these do not include any plot options info.
> 
>         Any help will be appreciated.
> 
>         Regards,
> 
>         PC
> --
> Pitak Chenkosol, Dept. Electrical Eng.,|  " I was born not knowing and have
> Portland State University,             |    only had a little time to change
> P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751. |    that here and there."
> E-mail: pitakc at ee.pdx.edu              |                Richard P. Feynman


  • Prev by Date: Re: Problems with creating EPS-Files
  • Next by Date: Re: Pi vs. 3.141592654
  • Previous by thread: Inverse Characteristic Function of Sum of Random Variables
  • Next by thread: Re: Pi vs. 3.141592654