MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Hi, I need a reference...

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg16158] Re: [mg16140] Hi, I need a reference...
  • From: "Kevin J. McCann" <kevinmccann at Home.com>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 01:13:09 -0500
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I like Nancy Blachman's book - "Mathematica - a Practical Approach",  It is
just out in a new (pricey) edition.  It may not be as detailed (advanced) as
you wish though.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Sanders <dman777 at worldnet.att.net>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg16158] [mg16140] Hi, I need a reference...


>Hi everyone,
>
>My favorite book on Mathematica programming is one by Gaylord et. al.,
>but I find myself bogged down in the chapter that introduces patterns and
>pattern-matching, sequence patterns, and predicates.  The explanation of
the
>aforementioned is fine, but there are not enough skill building exercises
on
>these topics.
>
>The problem is that I am more used to procedural programming (Pascal), and
I
>do not want to emulate that style with Mathematica.  I readily see the
>advantages of Mathematica programming, but seeing into it as deeply as I
>need to will take a problem set with a reasonable gradient.  It is in
search
>of such sets that I ask you help.  That is, a book, or articles, or
>collections of info that illuminate Mathematica's unique advantages.
>
>I have a particular interest just now in list building, and decision making
>without setting up if-then sequences.
>
>Those of you who know of such information, I would appreciate the
references
>as I am eager to get beyond this particular sand trap so to speak.
>I haven't found what I'm looking for in either Gray's book, or Maeder's
fine
>as they are in their way.  Skill builders is what I am looking for.
>
>Thanks,
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



  • Prev by Date: integration problem
  • Next by Date: classsical Programing vs a math package
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: integration problem
  • Next by thread: classsical Programing vs a math package