MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: fourier transforms

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg17533] Re: fourier transforms
  • From: adam.smith at hillsdale.edu
  • Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 01:13:07 -0400
  • Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
  • References: <7grgk2$e3i@smc.vnet.net> <7h7sdc$kmn@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I tried it on my machine (Windows NT 4.0) running Mathematica Version
3.0.1 and had the same problems Lucas had with the
FourierCosTransform.  The FourierSinTransform worked.  It could be a
system difference or maybe the versions are not identical.  I have run
into some things that worked under Version 3.0.0 that did not work
under 3.0.1 -  BesselJZeros in some cases

Adam Smith


In article <7h7sdc$kmn at smc.vnet.net>,
  Hendrik van Hees <h.vanhees at gsi.de> wrote:
> lucas wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > i am trying to do some fourier transforms with mathematica 3.0.  i
does
> > not behave as i expect, but perhaps i expect too much or do not
> > understand enough of mathematica.  anyway, check this out.
> >
> > f[x] = Exp[-m x]
> >
> > <<Calculus`FourierTransform`
> >
> > FourierCosTransform[f[x],x,a]
> >
> > is supposed to return
> >
> > m/(m^2 + a^2)  when m > 0
> >
> > but instead it returns the original FourierCosTransform[E^(-m
x),x,a],
> > which any dummy can figure out.
> >
> [...]
>
> My session of Mathematica 3.0 for your problem gives
> ===============================================================
> In[1]:= <<Calculus`FourierTransform`
>
> In[2]:= In[2]:=
> In[2]:= f[x_]=Exp[-m*x]
>
>          -(m x)
> Out[2]= E
>
> In[4]:= FourierCosTransform[f[x],x,a]
>
>            m
> Out[4]= -------
>          2    2
>         a  + m
>
> ===============================================================
>
> My system (although Mathematica is claimed to be independent of the
> system) is an intel Celeron 233 running Linux 2.2.5 and Mathematica
3.0
> for students.
>
> It might be the problem that you have forgotten the underscore in the
> definition of the orginal function f!
>
> --
> Hendrik van Hees		Phone:  ++49 06159 71-2755
> c/o GSI-Darmstadt SB 3.162	Fax:    ++49 06159 71-2990
> Planckstr. 1			mailto:h.vanhees at gsi.de
> D-64291 Darmstadt
http://theory.gsi.de/~vanhees/vanhees.html
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---


  • Prev by Date: Re: closing input cells
  • Next by Date: Re: Jacobian zeta function; Z(\phi|m)? [summary]
  • Previous by thread: Re: fourier transforms
  • Next by thread: Re: fourier transforms