Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1999
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1999

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: TeXForm in v4 better?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg20036] Re: TeXForm in v4 better?
  • From: king at dircon.co.uk (Nigel King)
  • Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 18:46:04 -0400
  • Organization: Consultant
  • References: <7se7oq$qui@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Matthias Weber <weber at math.uni-bonn.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> could please somebody check whether the following TeXForm bug
> of version 3.0 is still present in 4.0?
> 
> Try
> TeXForm[((-I*(-R^2 + z^2))/(1 + R^2*z^2))^a]
> 
> (this gives
> {{{\frac{-i\,\left( -{R^2} + {z^2} \right) } {1 + {R^2}\,{z^2}}}}^a} 
> )
> 
> Matthias

v4 gives

{\left( \frac{-\imag \,\left( -R^2 + z^2 \right) }
     {1 + R^2\,z^2} \right) }^a

which I think is somewhat better! I assume that \imag is defined in
Notebook.sty
-- 
Nigel King


  • Prev by Date: Re: Variables[] in general expressions
  • Next by Date: Re: Plot3D Problem with Nonreal Numbers
  • Previous by thread: Re: TeXForm in v4 better?
  • Next by thread: MathLink String type