MathGroup Archive 2000

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: image 2-d Fouriertransform ?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg21922] Re: image 2-d Fouriertransform ?
  • From: "Mariusz Jankowski" <mjkcc at>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 02:54:49 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: University of Southern Maine
  • References: <87av1h$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Maurus, a real signal cannot be uniquely represented by 1 quarter of the 2D
discrete Fourier transform (DFT) coefficients. I will use the following
non-symmetric 4 by 4 array:



(* I use InverseFourier as my definition of the DFT, as is common in
engineering, signal processing *)

The coefficients have complex conjugate symmetry - they are all related, not

For a short explanation on the ordering of the coefficients in 1D (think of
a single row or column of your 2D transform) see MathGroup archives from
approx 2 weeks ago.

Also take a look at my notebooks on Fourier series and transform in
Wolfram's courseware catalog I will
be adding a comprehensive set of notebooks on digital image processing to
the courseware catalog in the next couple of month - they may be helpful, if
you can wait that long.

Hope this helps,


Mariusz Jankowski
University of Southern Maine
mjkcc at

"maurus" <maurus at> wrote in message news:87av1h$nun at
> Hello,
> sorry for this question but ..
> i have a 2-d image with 8 bit grey level.
> Now i make a 2-d-Fouriertransform of the image (in  Mathematica)
> The result is a Picture with 4 quadrants, were the signals are
> significant.
> Now my questions:
> I think, only the first quadrant ist important ? Rest ist random ?
> What does the axis, the results  means ?
> If someone canl help me, i can send an example for better understanding.
> In this case, the Helpfunktion in Mathematica ist not to good.
> Thanks in advance
> Maurus

  • Prev by Date: RE: Re: Check[] *and* Off[]
  • Next by Date: Re: Creating Raster Image Animation
  • Previous by thread: Re: image 2-d Fouriertransform ?
  • Next by thread: Re: Sturm-Liouville Problem (differential equation eigenvalue problem)