|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Simplify[] shortcoming
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg21570] Re: [mg21525] Simplify[] shortcoming
- From: BobHanlon at aol.com
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 02:04:12 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
expr = (3*x + (x - y)*Log[x] + (x - y)*Log[-1 + y/x])/(x - y);
expr // Apart // Simplify
(3*x)/(x - y) + Log[x] + Log[y/x - 1]
Bob Hanlon
In a message dated 1/14/2000 4:04:26 AM, gorni at dimi.uniud.it writes:
>I have run into a simple expression for which both Simplify and
>FullSimplify cannot see an easy simplification:
>
>expr = (3*x + (x - y)*Log[x] + (x - y)*Log[-1 + y/x])/(x - y);
>
>You can see that the factors (x-y) cancel out with the denominator.
>So you can write expr as
>
>(3*x)/(x - y) + Log[x] + Log[-1 + y/x]
>
>which has a LeafCount of 21, while expr scored 34. Nevertheless,
>Simplify[] leaves expr as it was.
>
>FullSimplify[expr] does collect (x-y) in the numerator, but still
>the LeafCount is 29.
>
>My version is Mathematica 4 on MacOS.
>
Prev by Date:
Re: Clear
Next by Date:
Re: Problem with Display and ImageSize
Previous by thread:
Simplify[] shortcoming
Next by thread:
Re: Simplify[] shortcoming
|