|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Flat, OneIdentity attributes
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg21614] Re: [mg21600] Flat, OneIdentity attributes
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at tuins.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 02:35:06 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
If f is a function without any attributes we have:
In[1]:=
ClearAll[f]
In[2]:=
MatchQ[f[2], f[x_Integer]]
Out[2]=
True
If you give f the attribute Flat this is no longer true:
In[3]:=
SetAttributes[f, Flat]
In[4]:=
MatchQ[f[2], f[x_Integer]]
Out[4]=
False
but what is true instead (in fact always) is:
In[5]:=
MatchQ[f[2], f[x__Integer]]
Out[5]=
True
Note however that even in this case (with the Flat attribute present) you
get
In[6]:=
MatchQ[f[2], f[x_]]
Out[6]=
True
The reason why this works is that f[2] is re-written as f[f[2]] which
matches f[x_] but not f[x_Integer], thus
In[7]:=
MatchQ[f[f[2]], f[2]]
Out[7]=
True
In[8]:=
MatchQ[f[2], f[f[2]]]
Out[8]=
True
The presence of the OneIdentity attribute however means that again the
single argument match is used:
In[9]:=
SetAttributes[f, OneIdentity]
In[10]:=
MatchQ[f[2], f[x_Integer]]
Out[10]=
True
In fact when f has the Flat and the OneIdentity attributes you also get
matches like
In[11]:=
MatchQ[f[f[f[f[2]]]], f[x_Integer]]
Out[10]=
True
which do not work with only Flat attribute present.
Andrzej Kozlowski
Toyama International University
Toyama, Japan
http://sigma.tuins.ac.jp/
> From: "Ersek, Ted R" <ErsekTR at navair.navy.mil>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:43:47 -0500 (EST)
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg21614] [mg21600] Flat, OneIdentity attributes
>
> ClearAll[f]
> Attributes[f]={Flat,OneIdentity};
> f[2]/.f[n_Integer]:>n+10
>
> Out[9]=
> 12
>
> --------------------------------
> For reasons I can't understand the rule isn't used in the next example. Can
> anyone explain why?
>
> In[10]:=
> ClearAll[f]
> Attributes[f]={Flat};
> f[2]/.f[n_Integer]:>n+10
>
> Out[12]=
> f[2]
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Regards,
> Ted Ersek
Prev by Date:
Re: Question:Polar Field Plot
Next by Date:
Flat, OneIdentity Again
Previous by thread:
Re: Flat, OneIdentity attributes
Next by thread:
Re: Flat, OneIdentity attributes
|