MathGroup Archive 2000

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg24319] Re: [mg24308] With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]
  • From: Maarten.vanderBurgt at icos.be
  • Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 04:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,

Try With[{a = 2, b = 3}, Evaluate[c]].

Maarten





AES <siegman at stanford.edu> on 07-07-2000 06:11:52 AM


Subject: [mg24319]  [mg24308] With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]




Pages 359-360 of The Mathematica Book says (admittedly, taken a little
out of context),

   "You can think of  With  as a generalization of the /. operator. . ."

and

   " With[{x=x0}, body]  works essentially like body /. x->x0 . . . "

Great, looks neat, let's try it for evaluating expressions without
permanently setting the variables in them:

   In[1]:= c = a b

   Out[1]= a b

   In[2]:= c

   Out[2]= a b

   In[10]:= c /. {a -> 2, b -> 3}

   Out[10]= 6

   In[3]:= With[{a = 2, b = 3}, c]

   Out[3]= a b

*Not* what I was hoping for  . . .







  • Prev by Date: Re: Do loop var in deferred assignment
  • Next by Date: Re: Plotting multiple functions using Map
  • Previous by thread: Re: With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]
  • Next by thread: Re: With[{software=Mathematica}, Frustration]