|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Speeding up Replacement Rules
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg24527] Speeding up Replacement Rules
- From: "Johannes Ludsteck" <ludsteck at zew.de>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 03:04:08 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Zentr. f. Europ. Wirtschaftsforsch
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Dear MathGroup Members,
I use Mathematica to compute the hessian of a complicated
function of a vector of about 50 variables. My problem with the job
is that I need the mean of the hessian for about 50000 sets of
vector values.
Of course, it is simpe to compute a symbolic expression of the
hessian in two steps:
g=Map[D[f[args],#]&,args];
h=Map[D[g,#]&,args];
and to use this to compute the mean by defining a list of 500000
replacement rules, and to replace the stuff with
(Plus@@(h/.rules))/50000;
This works fine but very sloooooooow. Since I have to redo the
computation of the mean some hundred times, I nead a drastic
gain in speed. I think that the main reason for the poor performance
of my strategy is that the replacement operation is slow. I think it
should be possible to generate a Compiled function object which is
much faster. Since I expect that this will require some time, I would
like to know whether the increase in speed will compensate me for
the pains of the implementation.
Of course, if someone has Mathematica code which takes a vector
valued function and generates a Compiled gradient or hessian
function, I will accept it gratefully.
The simple advice to compute the hessian by hand and to put this
in a Compiled function is worthless for me, since I have to apply
the mean hessian computation to a variety of different functions.
Thank you,
Johannes Ludsteck
Johannes Ludsteck
Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)
Department of Labour Economics,
Human Resources and Social Policy
Phone (+49)(0)621/1235-157
Fax (+49)(0)621/1235-225
P.O.Box 103443
D-68034 Mannheim
GERMANY
Email: ludsteck at zew.de
Prev by Date:
Re: Equation of a "potato"
Next by Date:
Re: more wrong integrals
Previous by thread:
Re: Confluent hypergeometric functions of matrix argument
Next by thread:
Re: Speeding up Replacement Rules
|