MathGroup Archive 2000

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: Follow-up on Do[] Question

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg23368] RE: [mg23328] Follow-up on Do[] Question
  • From: "Higinio Ramos Calle" <higra at>
  • Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 02:59:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <com3 at ix.netcom*NOSPAM*.com>
To: mathgroup at
Subject: [mg23368] [mg23328] Follow-up on Do[] Question

> Hello,
> I recently posted a question on 4/29/00 (msg # 22498) in which I
> recieved emails addressing part 2 and part 3 of my question. Thanks to
> to those that helped.
> Part 1 however is of most importance not only for the problem at hand
> but to fill in a large gap in my understanding of Mathematica
> programming. So I will try and sharpen that question.
> Am I missing something or is the Do[] construct limited to processing
> only a single command ?
> The online help gives the following help on Do.
> Do[expr, {imax}] evaluates expr imax times. 
> But what if I have several expressions that I would like evaluated
> imax times ?
> Is there a way to accomplish something like 
> Do[expr1, expr2, expr3, . . .exprn, {imax}] ?
> When I try this I get a beep and a message that seems to indicate that
> the second item in the list must be imax which agrees with the online
> help.
> The intent here is to evaluate expr1 then expr2 then expr3, . . . then
> exprn. Then expr1 would be evaluated again followed by expr2 and so on
> until each expression is evaluated imax times.
This may help you 


H. Ramos

  • Prev by Date: RE: avoid spurious vertical segment in step function plot
  • Next by Date: Re: Follow-up on Do[] Question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Follow-up on Do[] Question
  • Next by thread: Re: Follow-up on Do[] Question