Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2000
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2000

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: Follow-up on Do[] Question

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg23368] RE: [mg23328] Follow-up on Do[] Question
  • From: "Higinio Ramos Calle" <higra at gugu.usal.es>
  • Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 02:59:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200005020443.AAA29174@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <com3 at ix.netcom*NOSPAM*.com>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg23368] [mg23328] Follow-up on Do[] Question


> Hello,
> 
> I recently posted a question on 4/29/00 (msg # 22498) in which I
> recieved emails addressing part 2 and part 3 of my question. Thanks to
> to those that helped.
> 
> Part 1 however is of most importance not only for the problem at hand
> but to fill in a large gap in my understanding of Mathematica
> programming. So I will try and sharpen that question.
> 
> Am I missing something or is the Do[] construct limited to processing
> only a single command ?
> 
> The online help gives the following help on Do.
> Do[expr, {imax}] evaluates expr imax times. 
> 
> But what if I have several expressions that I would like evaluated
> imax times ?
> 
> Is there a way to accomplish something like 
> Do[expr1, expr2, expr3, . . .exprn, {imax}] ?
> 
> When I try this I get a beep and a message that seems to indicate that
> the second item in the list must be imax which agrees with the online
> help.
> 
> The intent here is to evaluate expr1 then expr2 then expr3, . . . then
> exprn. Then expr1 would be evaluated again followed by expr2 and so on
> until each expression is evaluated imax times.
> 
This may help you 

Do[(Print[i];i++;Print[i^2]),{i,3}]

H. Ramos



  • Prev by Date: RE: avoid spurious vertical segment in step function plot
  • Next by Date: Re: Follow-up on Do[] Question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Follow-up on Do[] Question
  • Next by thread: Re: Follow-up on Do[] Question