|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: StringQ?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg25454] Re: StringQ?
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 02:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
- References: <8r1bae$ifr@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hmm,
what does it better than _String ?? and for what it is good
for ?
It seems always better (and faster) to look for the head of a data
type than to ask with a function if Head[a]===String
Regards
Jens
"J. Leko" wrote:
>
> While working on a problem in Mathematica 4.02, I happened to use a
> function StringQ. It just seemed like a logically named Mathematica
> function, and it followed the usual naming convention. I was surprised to
> learn, however, that this function is referenced no where in the
> Mathematica documentation. What is even more surprising is that it seems
> to have existed since at least version 2.2 (although I did see it
> referenced in Blachmann's "Mathematica Quick Reference version 2")!
>
> Is this an oversight on the part of WRI? Perhaps it was mistakenly left
> out of the docs in earlier versions. I can't imagine this being one of
> those "undocumented functions" wwhich are subject to change/removal from
> the language.
>
> J. Leko
>
> Please e-mail replies to leko*j at cspar.uah.edu and remove the *
Prev by Date:
Re: winding number
Next by Date:
Re: List element manipulation
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: winding number
Next by thread:
Re: troubles with 3D plot
|