|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: writing mathematica script files for the math kernel under linux
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg25228] Re: writing mathematica script files for the math kernel under linux
- From: Jos Bergervoet <bergervo at iaehv.iae.nl>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 02:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <8p9l3p$1v1@smc.vnet.net> <8pfejh$d43@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Phlip <phlip_cpp at my-deja.com> wrote:
> You'l probably be fine with 'mash.c' on your Linux. But I can't
> understand why so powerful and flexible a package should require such
> ridiculous hacks to beat the simple use-case of "scripting" out of it.
But for what exactly do you need mash.c? What is wrong with the
'math < inputfile > outputfile' solution? Until now I was satisfied
with that method to invoke mathematica from within a unix shell
(and with the '!' prefix to invoke the shell from within math) so
you made me curious what I am missing :-)
-- Jos
Prev by Date:
Re: Mapping down two lists
Next by Date:
Re: Re: mathlink
Previous by thread:
Re: writing mathematica script files for the math kernel under linux
Next by thread:
Plot... Import...
|