|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
2^3^4^5 in Mathematica?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg30258] 2^3^4^5 in Mathematica?
- From: seidov at yahoo.com (Zakir F. Seidov)
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 01:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <9j396v$iiv$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi,
Mathematica can't calculate exactly 2^3^4^5 not only because
there's no place in the whole Universe to save these some
1.124021466*10^488 digits.
But She can't even evaluate it as it is much nore than
$MaxNumber which in my case is only of some
3.2322801015848*10^8 digits.
Is it so?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Subject: [mg30258] Re: Exponents and notation
Author: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
Hi,
there is a good reason. Every high precision arithmetic must store
the number of the digits somewhere (in a base you like).
Typical the digit number is not a high precision number itself.
The overflow comes from the fact that for
2^3^4^5
Mathematica needs more than the number of allowed digits.
May be, that a 64-Bit Mathematica will help (for Sun's).
BTW the HP is wrong because
In[]:=
x = 2.^3^4;
xx = x*x*x*x*x
Out[]=
8.263199609878108*^121
but we can get an other result with
In[]:=x^5
Out[]=8.263199609878108*^121
*and* it is a *bug* that none of the results above generate an
Overflow[] (as it should) but 2.^3^4^5 does.
Only the Overflow[] result is correct.
Regards
Jens
>
> Hmm, this is the first I've seen the 'General::"ovfl": "Overflow
occurred in
> computation."' message. If I try a different calculation, say
8^8^8, I
> don't get an overflow, but instead Mathematica just happily tries to
find
> the results (but I'm not holding my breath).
>
> > Is the HP wrong ?
> >
> >
>
> Well it would seem to be grouping the operators differently, but
there may
> be a good reason for this?
>
> > L.DERUYCK
> > mailto://dr01202 at pophost.mediring.be
> >
>
> Michael
Prev by Date:
Re: Combining several InterploatingFunction to one
Next by Date:
Re: Re:"Limit involving square root"
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: "Re: Centroid of the Earth's Surface"
Next by thread:
confusing Mathematica?
|