Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2001
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2001

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: convert graphics

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg30625] Re: convert graphics
  • From: "Oliver Friedrich" <oliver.friedrich at tz-mikroelektronik.de>
  • Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:58:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <9mngnq$58e$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi Borut,

Graphics3D has a different option for Mesh than the other functions.
In Graphics3D you have to do the following:

Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[],primitive}].
So in Graphics3D, no mesh is made with a graphic directive EdgeForm[].

Learn something about EdgeForm, it should help

Oliver Friedrich
"Borut L" <borut at email.si> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:9mngnq$58e$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a ParametricPlot3D object (Graphic3D object), which I would like to
> have no mesh-lines. The option for Sufrace Graphics (Mesh -> False) is
what
> I would like. But I can't convert the first to the later. Is there a way
to
> convert it or is there alternative to disable mesh in Graphics3D object?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Borut Levart
>
>
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: Simplyfying expression
  • Next by Date: Re: confusing Mathematica?
  • Previous by thread: convert graphics
  • Next by thread: RE: convert graphics