Re: Algorithm Questions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg29402] Re: Algorithm Questions
- From: Mark Fisher <mark at markfisher.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 22:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <9gf01l$7lj$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Try this:
SetAttributes[RandomWithoutReplacement, HoldFirst]
RandomWithoutReplacement[ran_, n_Integer?Positive] :=
Module[{list = {}, r},
While[Length[list] < n, If[FreeQ[list, r = ran], AppendTo[list, r]]];
list
]
Needs["DiscreteMath`Permutations`"]
RandomWithoutReplacement[RandomPartition[100], 100]
--Mark.
Hu Zhe wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am wondering that if Mathematica has lazy-evaluation features. Say I
> am going to extract 100 lists from the permutation lists of {1,
> 2,...,100} (Permutation[Range[100]]) randomly.
>
> If I program like this:
>
> largeList = Permutation[Range[100]];
>
> indx = Table[Random[Integer, {1, 100!}], {100}];
>
> Part[largeList, indx]
>
> the program is very slow, since it works out all the 100! elements for
> the largeList, while I only need 100 items from it.
>
> Can I program like this ? Say,
>
> take 100 (somePermutationFunction 100)
>
> so that the permutation stops after 100 lists were taken. (I learned
> that it's called lazy-evaluation from Haskell.)
>
> The second question is that:
>
> I want the 100 lists randomly taken to be all different.
>
> So I program this way:
>
> While[Length[a] != 100,
> a = (Table[Random[Integer, {1, n!}], {100}] // Union)];
>
> there must be more efficient solutions, especially to combine the
> solution with the first question?
>
> So my slow program is like this, deeply welcome suggestions to improve
> it:
>
> randomList[n_, k_] :=
> Module[{a},
> While[Length[a] != k,
> a = (Table[Random[Integer, {1, n!}], {k}] // Union)];
> Part[Permutations[Range[n]], a]]
>
> Sincerely,
> Hu Zhe