|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: How big a problem can ConstrainedMax handle?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg31405] Re: How big a problem can ConstrainedMax handle?
- From: "Borut L" <borut at email.si>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 02:58:37 -0500 (EST)
- References: <9rodc2$psp$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
My experience is that the ConstrainedMax is very handy and stylish, not
having to type in the constraints in a conventional tableau form. The
problem is basically number crunching in my opinion, so I used SIMPLX
(simplex) algorithm from Numerical Recipes, being very satisfied with its
limitness and high speed.
bye,
Borut
"David Eppstein" <eppstein at ics.uci.edu> wrote in message
news:9rodc2$psp$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> I have a linear program I'd like to find the exact rational solution for,
> so naturally Mathematica's ConstrainedMax routine is looking promising.
Does
> anyone have any experience with using it for moderate to large problems?
> Say, 500 variables and 8000 constraints? I'm willing to let it run a
> couple days, but not a month...
> --
> David Eppstein UC Irvine Dept. of Information & Computer Science
> eppstein at ics.uci.edu http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
>
Prev by Date:
Re: weibull distribution
Next by Date:
RE: how to be as efficient as Sort[list] when list is {{x1,y1},{x2,y2},...}
Previous by thread:
Re: weibull distribution
Next by thread:
Re: How big a problem can ConstrainedMax handle?
|