Re: Zero does not equal Zero

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg31368] Re: [mg31360] Zero does not equal Zero*From*: Otto Linsuain <linsuain at andrew.cmu.edu>*Date*: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 03:30:59 -0500 (EST)*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I could not reproduce your error, here is my output from Mathematica 4 In[1]:= y=x+SetPrecision[5.9*^-450,30]; {y-x,y-x\[Equal]0} Out[2]= \!\({5.89999999999999999999999999999902278223326`30*^-450, False}\) I pasted this from a Mathematica notebook. A very curious point is that, in the notebook, the output looked like: {5.90000000000000000000000000000000000000 x 10^-450, False} but it changed upon "mousing" it !! But still, I haven't been able to reproduce a situation where x-y prints 0. x 10^some power and x-y==0 prints False. Also, we have to reckon with the fact that the output of x-y depends on printing options, besides precision. Well, that is my grain of sand. Otto Linsuain. On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ersek, Ted R wrote: > Hello Group, > > It seems people didn't fully grasp the inconsistency that I pointed to in my > earlier message with the same subject. I came across this problem when I > tried to make my RootSearch package (recent MathSource addition) capable of > finding roots to a an arbitrary precision. To allow that I had to make a > function similar to Ulp[x] in the NumericalMath`Microscope` package. Among > other things my version of Ulp can work with arbitrary precision numbers. > Unfortunately I can't make RootSearch work as well as I would like because > of the problem I demonstrate below. > > First consider the next line which demonstrates that a StandardForm output > such as (0. x 10^-20) represents an arbitrary precision number that is more > or less zero. > > In[1]:= > x=Exp[ N[Pi/3, 20] ]; > x-x > > Out[1]= > 0. x 10^-20 > > > Now suppose we want to find the arbitrary precision number that is slightly > larger than x, but as close as possible to x and still a different number. > What do I mean when I say "a different number"? Well if x and y are > different numbers their difference should not be zero. In the first case > below I view x and y as essentially the same number. > > In[2]:= > y=x+SetPrecision[5.96*^-20, 30]; > {y-x, y-x==0} > > Out[4]= > {0. x 10^-20, True} > > > What about the next case. Here the StandardForm of (x-y) looks like zero, > but (x-y==0) returns False. Are x and y "different numbers"? Why does > (x-y) return False in the next line, but True in the slightly different case > above? I think when comparing numeric values (x-y==0) should return True > IF AND ONLY IF the StandardForm of (x-y) is zero. When I say "is zero", > that includes (0. x 10^-20) and similar output. > > > In[5]:= > y=x+SetPrecision[5.97*^-20, 30]; > {y-x, y-x==0} > > Out[6] > {0. x 10^-20, False} > > > -------- > Regards, > Ted Ersek > > >

**RE: commuting and non-commuting symbols**

**RE: 2D to 3D graphics? and Thickness of Lines and Arcs**

**Zero does not equal Zero**

**RE: Zero does not equal Zero**