MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Laplace Transform bug?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg36290] Re: Laplace Transform bug?
  • From: Roland Franzius <Roland.franzius at Uos.de>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Uni Osnabrueck
  • References: <akkd1o$821$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Raul Martinez schrieb:

> To the Group,
>
> In[104]:=
> LaplaceTransform[D[f[t],t],t,s]
>
> Out[104]=
> -f[0] + s LaplaceTransform[f[t],t,s]
>
> In[105]:=
> LaplaceTransform[Integrate[f[t],t],t,s]
>
> Out[105]=
> LaplaceTransform[Integrate[f[t] ,t], t, s]
>
> Item 104 is correct, but item 105 is not. The correct 105 should be:
>
> -f[0]/s + LaplaceTransform[f[t],t,s]/s .
>
> If Mathematica can get 104 right, then it should also produce a correct
> 105.  This looks like a bug. Any thoughts on this?
>
> (Note: Number 105 does not look like that on the notebook page. It shows
> the indefinite integral with an integral symbol followed by f[t] dt
> instead of the function Integrate[ ]. I've spelled it out because the
> e-mail won't show the symbol.)

Use the definite integral
In:  LaplaceTransform[Integrate[ f[s], {s, 0, t}], t, a]

Out: LaplaceTransform[f[t], t, a]/a


--

Roland Franzius




  • Prev by Date: Re: Using a Named Pattern in a Rule
  • Next by Date: Resizing Graphics
  • Previous by thread: Laplace Transform bug?
  • Next by thread: matching nested heads