Re: Java3D and Mathematica, Lookout world!
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg38198] Re: Java3D and Mathematica, Lookout world!
- From: huhoic at aol.com (RAyRAy)
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:29:58 -0500 (EST)
- References: <asi18o$erj$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
For your numerical processing or any kind of processing be it symbolic would you rather use Java or make your own, or use Mathematica. I'm sure their program is as effient as possible, but i think i'd go with making my own algorithms in the code. First it depends on the version of mathematica that they have to see how well your application performs, and you don't know how future versions of Mathematica will behave or can even break your application. But I feel mathematica is powerful. Can you argue and put my doubts to rest? Thanks, RAyRAy =) hehhe >Subject: [mg38198] Java3D and Mathematica, Lookout world! >From: "Steven T. Hatton" hattons at globalsymmetry.com To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net >Date: 12/3/2002 2:32 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <asi18o$erj$1 at smc.vnet.net> > >I just got my "hello mathematical universe" Java3D animation running, I can >honestly say that this seems like an unbelievably powerful combination. >There are, shall we say, issues. Nonetheless, once I get used to what best >goes into Java Code, and what best goes into Mathematica, I believe this will > >redefine my idea of what Mathematica graphics are. I'm not sure how much >direct mapping I can do between Mathematica's native graphics functions and >Java 3D. I don't know much about extracting data from Mathematica's >graphics. If I can get a raw numeric representation of Mathematicas >graphics, it should be fairly easy to feed this to Java3D. > >This is cool! >-- >STH >Hatton's Law: >"There is only One inviolable Law." >