Re: Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg32878] Re: [mg32867] Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?
- From: George Woodrow <georgevw3 at mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 05:21:56 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Mathematica under OS X is worth the upgrade. Faster, more stable, etc. I've been using it since the public preview. -- Yes it *is* a bit faster than the same version under OS 9 with the same hardware. Personally, I like OS X a lot. Everything works better. The only thing I dip into Classic for is PhotoShop and that app should be carbonized next month. Enjoy your new computer. george On Saturday, February 16, 2002, at 04:35 am, Ron Griffin wrote: > Any of you Mac Mathematica users have advice for me regarding a > preference > between front ends? It's machine upgrade time for me (from 8600/300 to > G4/933) so I need to get a license change from Wolfram. Since I have > to file for a change, should I also make the jump to X? Some of my > other apps will keep me working in the classic os mode, and I'm very > happy working in os 9.1 anyway. I currently use Mathematica 4.1. I > haven't > fired up the new machine yet, and I have no idea if I'll like X. But > if it's better I'll like it. >