Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2002
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg32878] Re: [mg32867] Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?
  • From: George Woodrow <georgevw3 at mac.com>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 05:21:56 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Mathematica under OS X is worth the upgrade. Faster, more stable, etc. 
I've been using it since the public preview.  -- Yes it *is* a bit 
faster than the same version under OS 9 with the same hardware.

Personally, I like OS X a lot. Everything works better. The only thing I 
dip into Classic for is PhotoShop and that app should be carbonized next 
month.

Enjoy your new computer.

george

On Saturday, February 16, 2002, at 04:35  am, Ron Griffin wrote:

> Any of you Mac Mathematica users have advice for me regarding a 
> preference
> between front ends?  It's machine upgrade time for me (from 8600/300 to
> G4/933) so I need to get a license change from Wolfram.  Since I have
> to file for a change, should I also make the jump to X?  Some of my
> other apps will keep me working in the classic os mode, and I'm very
> happy working in os 9.1 anyway.  I currently use Mathematica 4.1.  I 
> haven't
> fired up the new machine yet, and I have no idea if I'll like X.  But
> if it's better I'll like it.
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?
  • Next by Date: mathlink beginner problem
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?
  • Next by thread: Re: Mathematica for Mac OS X vs. 9?