|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
ContourPlot3D: plot implicitly defined surfaces
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg35269] ContourPlot3D: plot implicitly defined surfaces
- From: jl_03824 at yahoo.com (Jun Lin)
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 02:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Given two functions F=F(x,y;a,b) and G=G(x,y;a,b), the relations
F(x,y;a,b)=0, and
{
G(x,y;a,b)=0
implicitly define another two functions x=x(a,b) and y=y(a,b). Suppose
functions F and G are implicit and transcendental, it is cumbersome to
get x and y simultaniously from F=0 and G=0. Is it possible to plot
surfaces x=x(a,b) and y=y(a,b) according to F=0 and G=0 by means of
ContourPlot3D?
Any suggestion and advice will be appreciated.
Jun Lin
Prev by Date:
Optimization package
Next by Date:
How to suppress the mesh in ParametricPlot3D ?
Previous by thread:
RE: Optimization package
Next by thread:
Re: ContourPlot3D: plot implicitly defined surfaces
|