|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Quantile function
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg35374] Re: [mg35316] Quantile function
- From: BobHanlon at aol.com
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:19:39 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In a message dated 7/8/02 3:37:12 AM, a at a.a writes:
>When using the quantile function:
>
>In[7]:=
>Quantile[dist, 0.8]
>
>Out[7]=
>0.841621
>
>can anyone tell me how to get more accuracy?
>
Needs["Statistics`NormalDistribution`"]
dist = NormalDistribution[0, 1];
Quantile[dist, 0.8]
0.841621
The display is truncated for output. The InputForm shows this.
Quantile[dist, 0.8] // InputForm
0.8416212335729144
NumberForm will display additional digits but only up to the maximum
consistent with machine precision.
NumberForm[Quantile[dist, 0.8], 20]
0.841621233572914
For precision beyond machine precision you need to use exact or higher
precision numbers in the definition of the distribution (as above) and in
the call to Quantile.
N[Quantile[dist, 8/10], 20]
0.84162123357291420518
Quantile[dist, N[8/10, 20]]
0.84162123357291420518
Bob Hanlon
Chantilly, VA USA
Prev by Date:
Re: Simplify inequalities
Next by Date:
RE: Simplify inequalities
Previous by thread:
Re: Quantile function
Next by thread:
entering problem
|