[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Question about Replace
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg35753] Re: Question about Replace
*From*: "John Doty" <jpd at w-d.org>
*Date*: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 03:13:27 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <ai06os$1f6$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <ai06os$1f6$1 at smc.vnet.net>, "Andrzej Kozlowski"
<andrzej at tuins.ac.jp> wrote:
> Actually on second thoughts I began to suspect that this question is
> related to another one posted by Heather, concerning simplifying
> expressions in which x is "much larger than" y. I am not at all sure if
> a sensible calculus of this kind can be developed but obviously Simplify
> will not do this.
It seems to me that this is essentially a (capital-C) "Calculus" problem,
and unless a simple /.y->0 is what's wanted, the correct tool is Limit[].
Berkeley's critique of 18th century Calculus applies here: while it was
essentially antiscientific, his reasoning was flawless and should warn us
against trying to solve this sort of problem by mindless algebra.
Of course, Limit[] is a tricky and somewhat unreliable power tool,
requiring caution. This reflects the mathematical subtlety of this kind
of problem. It is generally essential to formulate the problem in such a
way that the direction of the approach to the limit is unambiguous.
--
| John Doty "You can't confuse me, that's my job."
| Home: jpd at w-d.org
| Work: jpd at space.mit.edu
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: A faster alternative to ListIntegrate?**
Next by Date:
**Re: A faster alternative to ListIntegrate? [2]**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: Question about Replace**
Next by thread:
**Re: RE: RE: Question about Replace**
| |