MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

FourierTransform

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg34336] FourierTransform
  • From: Michael Hartl <susiarglos at gmx.de>
  • Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 03:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Reply-to: Mike Hartl <susiarglos at gmx.de>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Some time ago I encountered following curious results from
FourierTransform in V 4.1.0 for the Fourier transform of 4 equivalent
expressions and notified WRI's support.  In[3] and In[4] give correct
results while the equivalent expressions In[5] and In[6] differ.  Is
there anything wrong with the syntax?  Especially the dependency on the
variable name (u in In[5] and b in In[6]) puzzles me.  (Results in V
4.0.1 were different but not consistent too.)

In[1]:= $Version

Out[1]= 4.1 for Microsoft Windows (November 2, 2000)

In[2]:= $ReleaseNumber

Out[2]= 0

In[3]:= FourierTransform[Exp[I a + I x u], x, k]

         I a
Out[3]= E    Sqrt[2 Pi] DiracDelta[k + u]

In[4]:= FourierTransform[Exp[I a + I x b], x, k]

         I a
Out[4]= E    Sqrt[2 Pi] DiracDelta[b + k]

In[5]:= FourierTransform[Exp[I (a + x u)], x, k]

Out[5]= 0

In[6]:= FourierTransform[Exp[I (a + x b)], x, k]

                          I (a + b x)
Out[6]= FourierTransform[E           , x, k] 


Mike


  • Prev by Date: Re: HTMLSave
  • Next by Date: how mathematica deals with complex i in output
  • Previous by thread: Re: HTMLSave
  • Next by thread: how mathematica deals with complex i in output