|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: The Essence of Mathematica
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg37143] Re: [mg37134] The Essence of Mathematica
- From: Richard Palmer <mapsinc at bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 05:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I think a better place to look for the essential aspects of Mathematica are
in rule application, pattern matching, and mathematical knowledge. I will
be interested in hearing what other people have to say.
Richard Palmer
On 10/12/02 5:05 AM, "Steven" <hattons at speakeasy.net> wrote:
> I'm attempting to identify the essential aspects of Mathematica. I believe
> the
> place to start is with the 'functional operations'. I'm seeking the
> 'basis' of Mathematica. Kind of the orthonormal subset of functionality
> which can be used to derive all the other. I'm also trying to be
> pragmatic. I'm not trying to reinvent Mathematica, I'm just trying to
> understand
> the invention that already exists.
>
> If anyone is interested in seeing what I've gathered so far, I have a
> notebook in both HTML, and Mathematica (4.2, if that matters) notebook format
> available here:
>
> http://public.globalsymmetry.com/proprietary/com/wri/notebooks/with-gif/essent
> ial/essential.nb
> http://public.globalsymmetry.com/proprietary/com/wri/notebooks/with-gif/essent
> ial/index.html
>
> Please let me know if you have any problems accessing these. The sysadmin is
> kind of new at running a DNS server. The server may go down for a while at
> sometime in the near future for an upgrade (SuSE Linux 8.0 -> 8.1).
> Ideally that should take about an hour... and then there's reality...
>
> What I'm hoping for is some constructive feedback regarding my selection of
> functions. I am aware that I've neglected the more advanced use of these
> functions such as level specification. I'm trying to keep things as simple
> as possible. I'm not looking for the obfuscated Mathematica challenge. Not
> just
> yet. I'm seeking the examples which, if correctly understood, will make
> other Mathematica functionality fall into place. I believe there is also a
> set of
> 'procedural operators' which can properly be treated separately. I hope to
> get to them soon.
>
> I know I've received some very good feedback on other questions I've asked
> on the news group. I owe people responses to their thoughtful input. I
> hope to address these soon. I am very grateful to all who have responded
> to my questions.
>
> STH
Prev by Date:
RE: ParametricPlot Question
Next by Date:
Re: Some list questions
Previous by thread:
Re: The Essence of Mathematica
Next by thread:
5th Degree Polynomials
|