Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2002
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: List processing

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg37251] Re: List processing
  • From: Mark Westwood <MarkCWestwood at compuserve.com>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 05:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <aokbp7$afv$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

John

The simplest solution to your trial problem that I could come up with
was the following:

Apply[List, Apply[Interval, {{100, 200}, {150, 250}, {120, 270}, {300,
400}}]]

I hope you can figure it out.  I didn't test it on a larger input
dataset - my usual experience is that built-in functions are faster for
operations on lists than fiddling around with loops.

Regards
Mark Westwood

John Leary wrote:
> 
> Greetings
> 
> This problem can be solved by conventional programming, but I wonder if
> there is an elegant Mathematica solution ?
> 
> A list contains pairs of values, with each pair representing the lower and
> upper edge of a sub-range.  Some of the sub-ranges partially overlap, some
> fully overlap, others don't overlap at all.  The problem is to produce a
> second list that contains the overall upper and lower edges of the
> overlapping sub-ranges.
> 
> A simple example :  {{100,200},{150,250},{120,270},{300,400}}  would result
> in {{100,270},{300,400}}.
> 
> In the real case, the input list has several hundred elements and the
> output list typically has five elements.
> 
> I have a working solution based on loops, but there must be a more elegant
> one.  I would be very grateful for any suggestions.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> John Leary


  • Prev by Date: Re: grouping and averaging {x,y} pairs of data
  • Next by Date: Re: List processing
  • Previous by thread: Re: List processing
  • Next by thread: Re: List processing