[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Not quite a Swell FLOOP?
I must admit, Mathematica looks a lot different to me after having done some real programming in Java, than it did a few years ago. I understand it much better, but I also find myself grasping for things that don't seem to be native to the product/language. There seems to be virtually no native support for OOP in Mathematica. Am I understanding things correctly? Dr. MÃ¤der (I'm being a bit stubborn here - use UTF-8) provides his own object package with his Computer Science with Mathematica. I haven't worked with yet, but by looking it over, it seems a bit kluged ( http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=*&Query=kluge ). I don't mean to upbraid Dr. MÃ¤der's attempt to add functionality which probably should be a native part of the Mathematica language. Perhaps I'll get used to the approach he has used, but for now, I must say, it seems awkward. My guess is Dr. MÃ¤der did the best that could be expected with the constraints under which he was working. It is inconceivable to me that I am the first person to question the lack of native OO support in Mathematica. There must be a history of discussion on this topic. Is anybody aware of a record of such? Am I not understanding things correctly? Do others believe OO support is lacking in Mathematica, and really 'should' be here? -- STH Hatton's Law: "There is only One inviolable Law."