FW: Re: empirical CDF
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg36664] FW: [mg36643] Re: [mg36619] empirical CDF
- From: Blimbaum Jerry DLPC <BlimbaumJE at ncsc.navy.mil>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 02:09:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
There is a very nice java applet at
http://statman.stat.sc.edu/~west/javahtml/classes/ , in which you can
include your own data by replacing what is in the Applet with your own,
which gives you a real time histogram plot and lets you alter the bin width
and see how this effects the histogram....it wasnt until I saw this that i
understood the significance of choosing the bin width......jerry blimbaum
From: Bill Rowe [mailto:listuser at earthlink.net]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg36664] [mg36643] Re: [mg36619] empirical CDF
On 9/13/02 at 11:33 PM, swidrygiello at wp.pl (Swidrygiello) wrote:
>Does anybody know how to calculate in Mathematica:
>d)QQ-plot two different random samples?!
Yes, but there are a number of issues particularly with an empirical PDF. A
very nice package that does all of the above and more is mathStatica. See
http://www.mathstatica.com for details.
Obviously, it is less expensive to write your own functions.
Just recently in message [mg36613] Mark Fisher posted code that addresses
the empirical CDF. However, in this code you may want to replace 1/n with
1/(n+1) or (j-0.5)/n depending on your application. Note, these will have no
significant effect for large data sets.
The key issue with an empirical PDF is deciding the bin width. A simple
approach would be to use the functions in Statistics`DataManipulation` and
Graphics`Graphics`. Look at the functions Histogram, Frequencies and
BinListCounts. More sophisticated approaches involve kernel methods. These
methods will generate smoother estimates for the PDF. Again, the key is
bandwidth. There is no apriori choice for bin width or bandwith. Bad choices
will obscure significant features in the data set.
Prev by Date:
Re: Checking Programming errors; a ?
Next by Date:
Re: RE: Re: Why is my Implementation of Sorted Trees So Slow?
Previous by thread:
Next by thread:
RE: FW: Re: empirical CDF