Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg40671] Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"
- From: Paul McHale <NewsGroups at double*NOSPAM*esolutions.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 03:13:51 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <b6e7j6$85b$1@smc.vnet.net> <200304060834.EAA01872@smc.vnet.net> <200304100742.DAA24305@smc.vnet.net> <b75o54$28p$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 06:42:44 +0000 (UTC), Dr Bob <majort at cox-internet.com> wrote: >Do, While, and For are often the least efficient (slowest) way to do things >in terms of execution time. We see this time after time in our function >wars. Isn't this just because Mathematica was optimized for functional programming. Couldn't it be optimized for procedural as well (like every C compiler) ?
- References:
- Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"
- From: nafod40 <may106@SPAMAWAY.psu.edu>
- Re: Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"
- From: David Terr <dterr@wolfram.com>
- Re: Opinions about the "Oneliners"