MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Simplification of definite integral?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg40696] Re: [mg40673] Simplification of definite integral?
  • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 04:00:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Mathematica has difficulties dealing with the (apparent) singularities 
at x==d and x == -d so if you try straight forward Integrate it want's 
you to assume that d non-real. However, you can get an answer probably 
closer to what you desire by setting the PrincipalValue option to True:


Integrate[Sin[x-d]/(
   x-d) Sin[x+d]/(x+
       d),{x,-Infinity,Infinity},PrincipalValue->True,Assumptions->{d>0}]


(Pi*Cos[d]*Sin[d])/d

For example for d =1 we get:


%/.d->1.


1.42832

This is probably right, particularly that


NIntegrate[(Sin[x - 1]/(x - 1))*(Sin[x + 1]/(x + 1)),
   {x, -Infinity, 1, Infinity}]


NIntegrate::slwcon:Numerical integration converging too slowly; suspect 
one \
of the following: singularity, value of the integration being 0, 
oscillatory \
integrand, or insufficient WorkingPrecision. If your integrand is 
oscillatory \
try using the option Method->Oscillatory in NIntegrate.


NIntegrate::ncvb:NIntegrate failed to converge to prescribed accuracy 
after 7 \
recursive bisections in x near x = 187.1757811919331`.


1.4283406894658994


Andrzej Kozlowski
Yokohama, Japan
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~akoz/
http://platon.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/andrzej/





On Sunday, April 13, 2003, at 03:17  pm, Dr. Wolfgang Hintze wrote:

> How do I get a satisfactory result from mathematica for this function
>
> f[d]:=Integrate[Sin[x-d]/(x-d) Sin[x+d]/(x+d),{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]
>
> I tried
>
> f[d]//ComplexExpand
>
> and several assumptions but I didn't succeed. Any hints?
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: Simplification of definite integral?
  • Next by Date: Re: linking package
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Simplification of definite integral?
  • Next by thread: Re[3]: Re: Simplification of definite integral?