MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Leibniz Definition Of Pi Not In 5.0.0?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg43233] Re: Leibniz Definition Of Pi Not In 5.0.0?
  • From: lalu_bhatt at yahoo.com (Bhuvanesh)
  • Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 22:25:46 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <bht3v3$n4n$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

"H. Burke Jensen" <hbj at ColoradoKidd.com> wrote:
> Does Mathematica 5.0.0 not recognize the Leibniz definition of Pi [Ref.1]?
> This was recognized in Mathematica 3.0.1 and reported to WRI.

The divergence message is incorrect, but this simpler form works:

In[1]:= $Version

Out[1]= 5.0 for Microsoft Windows (June 10, 2003)

In[2]:= Sum[(-1)^(n+1)/(2*n - 1), {n, 1, Infinity}]

        Pi
Out[2]= --
        4

Thanks for the report.

--
Bhuvanesh,
Wolfram Research.

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed herein are mine and do not
necessarily reflect those of Wolfram Research.


  • Prev by Date: Re: How to evaulate a function and graph it
  • Next by Date: Re: [newbie] can't get the answer
  • Previous by thread: Leibniz Definition Of Pi Not In 5.0.0?
  • Next by thread: Leibniz Definition Of Pi Not In 5.0.0?