MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: summing 1/(n!) from 21 to Infinity

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg45047] Re: summing 1/(n!) from 21 to Infinity
  • From: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)
  • Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:22:44 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <brci24$2p7$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

The negative answer is caused by loss of precision.

N[Sum[1/(n!), {n, 21, Infinity}], 30]

Bobby

Sampo Smolander <sampo.smolander+newsnspam at helsinki.fi> wrote in message news:<brci24$2p7$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> I'd be happy if somebody explained what could be behind
> this odd behavior:
> 
> When I do:
> 
>    Sum[ 1 /(n!), {n, 21, Infinity}] // N
> 
> I get a -4.44089 * 10^(-16), which doesn't make much
> sense, since it's negative and none of the summands are.
> 
> The same with symbolic starting point,
> 
>    Sum[ 1 /(n!), {n, m, Infinity}] // N
> 
> gives:
> 
>    E - E Gamma[m,1]/Gamma[m]
> 
> Now where might the mistake be? I don't know enough maths to be able to
> say whether the symbolic sum is wrong -- which however feels more likely
> than a mistake in the implementation of the gamma function.
> 
> (I computed the above with Mathematica 4.0, on win98)


  • Prev by Date: Re: newbie question
  • Next by Date: Re: Different limits for simplied and non-simplified function
  • Previous by thread: Re: summing 1/(n!) from 21 to Infinity
  • Next by thread: Efficient Monte Carlo code